Another Response To Atheists

๐—”๐—ก๐—ข๐—ง๐—›๐—˜๐—ฅ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—˜ ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—”๐—ง๐—›๐—˜๐—œ๐—ฆ๐—ง๐—ฆ
As I continue to field comments (sometimes vitriolic and abusive) from atheists on my YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/@kevinsimington2523 I occasionally post a reply to the most commonly raised objections. Here is another of my recent replies, this time a response to the commonly asked question, “๐—ช๐—›๐—ข ๐— ๐—”๐——๐—˜ ๐—š๐—ข๐——?”:

๐— ๐—ฌ ๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—ฆ๐—ฃ๐—ข๐—ก๐—ฆ๐—˜
A common objection raised below and also on a couple of the other episodes is regarding the origin of God. During my years of teaching high school students, the question, โ€œ๐™’๐™๐™ค ๐™ข๐™–๐™™๐™š ๐™‚๐™ค๐™™?โ€ was probably the one that was most commonly asked. Not surprisingly, the question gets a lot of airplay in the adult world as well. โ€œ๐™„๐™› ๐™‚๐™ค๐™™ ๐™ข๐™–๐™™๐™š ๐™š๐™ซ๐™š๐™ง๐™ฎ๐™ฉ๐™๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ, ๐™ฌ๐™๐™ค ๐™ข๐™–๐™™๐™š ๐™‚๐™ค๐™™?โ€ is one of the scepticโ€™s favourite questions, asked repeatedly by Richard Dawkins and other outspoken โ€˜new atheistsโ€™. It is wielded like a mighty sword that is designed to cut the legs out from underneath anyone foolish enough to declare their belief in a supernatural Creator.

But the question “๐™’๐™๐™ค ๐™ค๐™ง ๐™ฌ๐™๐™–๐™ฉ ๐™ข๐™–๐™™๐™š ๐™‚๐™ค๐™™?โ€ is facile. Because if someone or something else made God then, clearly, the being we are calling ‘Godโ€™ is not God at all โ€“ he is merely another created being himself. Furthermore, whoever made the being we previously called ‘God’ is clearly greater than ‘God’. Perhaps, this earlier creator is God? But who made him? This kind of thinking leads to an infinite regression of causes.

Proposing a God who is temporally finite and who had a beginning contradicts any sensible definition of God. If there is a God who created our space-time continuum, it is fair to assume that he must exist outside or beyond our space-time continuum and must, therefore, be both immaterial and timeless – having no beginning. This is why I say that the question โ€œ๐™’๐™๐™ค ๐™ข๐™–๐™™๐™š ๐™‚๐™ค๐™™?โ€ that many on this discussion thread are asking is facile.

The theistic view that โ€œ๐™‚๐™ค๐™™ ๐™ข๐™–๐™™๐™š ๐™ช๐™จโ€ is not the unanswerable dead end that atheists claim it to be. There is a logical, reasonable answer to the question, โ€œ๐™’๐™๐™ค ๐™ข๐™–๐™™๐™š ๐™‚๐™ค๐™™?โ€ The answer lies in the uncaused nature of God himself, as is inferred by logical, philosophical deduction. Let me unpack this line of deductive reasoning in more detail:

> Any Creator of the natural world (the physical universe) must necessarily exist outside of nature and not be bound by it. It or He (letโ€™s stick with โ€œHeโ€) must necessarily be supernatural (meaning beyond nature), as it is a self-defeating statement to say that nature created itself.

> As nature is now understood by science to be the โ€˜space-time continuumโ€™, meaning that it consists of physical dimensions and lineal time, the Creator must exist outside of those natural constraints. He cannot be bound by the things he created before he created them, nor can he be bound by them afterward.

> Thus, the supernatural Creator of nature is necessarily both timeless and dimensionless. A being who is anything less than this, could not have created our space-time continuum.

> The timelessness of God, in particular, infers โ€˜causeless-nessโ€™. Cause and effect only apply to lineal time within the natural world, where there is a โ€˜beforeโ€™ and an โ€˜afterโ€™. In an atemporal (timeless) realm, โ€˜beforeโ€™ and โ€˜afterโ€™ are meaningless, as are the concepts of โ€˜beginningโ€™ and โ€˜endโ€™, and โ€˜causeโ€™ and โ€˜effectโ€™.

> Thus, if God exists, he must be timeless (eternal) and causeless (uncreated).

This accords with the Christian scriptures, which describe God as โ€œ๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™ž๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฉโ€ (spatially dimensionless) and timeless (eternal). Several Bible passages hint at this latter truth, including Godโ€™s revealed name to Moses as โ€œ๐™„ ๐˜ผ๐™ˆโ€ (Exod 3:14), meaning the ever-present one, and Jesusโ€™ reference to his eternal existence with the Father before the creation of the world (John 17:5).

So, who made God? No-one. He is unmade and causeless. Without beginning.

The theological and philosophical term for this concept is the โ€œaseityโ€ of God. It refers to Godโ€™s self-existence and self-caused nature. It comes from the Latin words โ€œaโ€ (โ€œfromโ€) and โ€œseโ€ (โ€œselfโ€). It means that while everything else that exists has a cause outside itself, God is eternally self-caused. His existence is derived โ€œ๐™›๐™ง๐™ค๐™ข ๐™๐™ž๐™ข๐™จ๐™š๐™ก๐™›โ€ โ€“ He is his own eternal cause.

Of course, merely giving something a fancy name doesnโ€™t make it so. But the point is that the question, โ€œ๐™’๐™๐™ค ๐™ข๐™–๐™™๐™š ๐™‚๐™ค๐™™?โ€, is strangely self-contradictory. It is essentially asking, โ€œWho created the uncreated one?โ€ That is because God, if He does exist, must, by definition, be eternal. The One who created time must necessarily exist beyond it.

This is not to say that the theistic explanation is easy to understand. A timeless, uncaused God may be logically deducible, but the concept certainly does our heads in!

Here is the link to my YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@kevinsimington2523

If you are interested in my “๐™€๐™ซ๐™ž๐™™๐™š๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š ๐™๐™ค๐™ง ๐˜ฝ๐™š๐™ก๐™ž๐™š๐™›” series, I suggest you start with Episode 1: “๐™๐™๐™š ๐™Š๐™ง๐™ž๐™œ๐™ž๐™ฃ ๐™ค๐™› ๐™ฉ๐™๐™š ๐™๐™ฃ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™š”.