๐๐ก๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ฃ๐ข๐ก๐ฆ๐ ๐ง๐ข ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฆ๐ง๐ฆ
As I continue to field comments (sometimes vitriolic and abusive) from atheists on my YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/@kevinsimington2523 I occasionally post a reply to the most commonly raised objections. Here is another of my recent replies, this time a response to the commonly asked question, “๐ช๐๐ข ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ข๐?”:
๐ ๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ฃ๐ข๐ก๐ฆ๐
A common objection raised below and also on a couple of the other episodes is regarding the origin of God. During my years of teaching high school students, the question, โ๐๐๐ค ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐ค๐?โ was probably the one that was most commonly asked. Not surprisingly, the question gets a lot of airplay in the adult world as well. โ๐๐ ๐๐ค๐ ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฃ๐, ๐ฌ๐๐ค ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐ค๐?โ is one of the scepticโs favourite questions, asked repeatedly by Richard Dawkins and other outspoken โnew atheistsโ. It is wielded like a mighty sword that is designed to cut the legs out from underneath anyone foolish enough to declare their belief in a supernatural Creator.
But the question “๐๐๐ค ๐ค๐ง ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฉ ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐ค๐?โ is facile. Because if someone or something else made God then, clearly, the being we are calling ‘Godโ is not God at all โ he is merely another created being himself. Furthermore, whoever made the being we previously called ‘God’ is clearly greater than ‘God’. Perhaps, this earlier creator is God? But who made him? This kind of thinking leads to an infinite regression of causes.
Proposing a God who is temporally finite and who had a beginning contradicts any sensible definition of God. If there is a God who created our space-time continuum, it is fair to assume that he must exist outside or beyond our space-time continuum and must, therefore, be both immaterial and timeless – having no beginning. This is why I say that the question โ๐๐๐ค ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐ค๐?โ that many on this discussion thread are asking is facile.
The theistic view that โ๐๐ค๐ ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐ช๐จโ is not the unanswerable dead end that atheists claim it to be. There is a logical, reasonable answer to the question, โ๐๐๐ค ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐ค๐?โ The answer lies in the uncaused nature of God himself, as is inferred by logical, philosophical deduction. Let me unpack this line of deductive reasoning in more detail:
> Any Creator of the natural world (the physical universe) must necessarily exist outside of nature and not be bound by it. It or He (letโs stick with โHeโ) must necessarily be supernatural (meaning beyond nature), as it is a self-defeating statement to say that nature created itself.
> As nature is now understood by science to be the โspace-time continuumโ, meaning that it consists of physical dimensions and lineal time, the Creator must exist outside of those natural constraints. He cannot be bound by the things he created before he created them, nor can he be bound by them afterward.
> Thus, the supernatural Creator of nature is necessarily both timeless and dimensionless. A being who is anything less than this, could not have created our space-time continuum.
> The timelessness of God, in particular, infers โcauseless-nessโ. Cause and effect only apply to lineal time within the natural world, where there is a โbeforeโ and an โafterโ. In an atemporal (timeless) realm, โbeforeโ and โafterโ are meaningless, as are the concepts of โbeginningโ and โendโ, and โcauseโ and โeffectโ.
> Thus, if God exists, he must be timeless (eternal) and causeless (uncreated).
This accords with the Christian scriptures, which describe God as โ๐จ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ฉโ (spatially dimensionless) and timeless (eternal). Several Bible passages hint at this latter truth, including Godโs revealed name to Moses as โ๐ ๐ผ๐โ (Exod 3:14), meaning the ever-present one, and Jesusโ reference to his eternal existence with the Father before the creation of the world (John 17:5).
So, who made God? No-one. He is unmade and causeless. Without beginning.
The theological and philosophical term for this concept is the โaseityโ of God. It refers to Godโs self-existence and self-caused nature. It comes from the Latin words โaโ (โfromโ) and โseโ (โselfโ). It means that while everything else that exists has a cause outside itself, God is eternally self-caused. His existence is derived โ๐๐ง๐ค๐ข ๐๐๐ข๐จ๐๐ก๐โ โ He is his own eternal cause.
Of course, merely giving something a fancy name doesnโt make it so. But the point is that the question, โ๐๐๐ค ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐ค๐?โ, is strangely self-contradictory. It is essentially asking, โWho created the uncreated one?โ That is because God, if He does exist, must, by definition, be eternal. The One who created time must necessarily exist beyond it.
This is not to say that the theistic explanation is easy to understand. A timeless, uncaused God may be logically deducible, but the concept certainly does our heads in!
Here is the link to my YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@kevinsimington2523
If you are interested in my “๐๐ซ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ค๐ง ๐ฝ๐๐ก๐๐๐” series, I suggest you start with Episode 1: “๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ฃ ๐ค๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐จ๐”.